The Guardian
British daily with major US edition. Owned by the Scott Trust, a nonprofit that exists solely to secure the editorial independence of The Guardian in perpetuity.
How We Measure Tone
Tone is a numeric score from −6 to +6 measuring how a statement characterizes legislation — not whether we agree with it. The score reflects language intensity, not correctness.
“They named a mass detention bill after one victim to make it politically impossible to oppose.”
— Joy Reid on the Laken Riley Act“The concern from civil liberties groups is the 48-hour takedown mandate — that gives platforms an incentive to over-remove content.”
— Chris Hayes on the TAKE IT DOWN Act“The bill passed the House 218 to 206 with two Democratic votes. It faces a 60-vote threshold in the Senate.”
— Jake Tapper on the Sports Act“The One Big Beautiful Bill was a solid win, in part because it dodged some terrible policy.”
— Kimberley Strassel on the OBBBA“This is a common-sense bill. Laken Riley would be alive today if this law had been in place.”
— Sean Hannity on the Laken Riley ActTone measures how a personality frames legislation, not whether their framing is accurate. A +5.0 and a −5.0 can both be factually correct — the score reflects advocacy intensity. We don't rate outlets as left or right. We measure what they say.
On-Air Talent Spend
No Salary Data Available
The Guardian is nonprofit-funded. Compensation for nonprofit media personalities is rarely disclosed publicly — a structural difference from corporate outlets where court filings and trade press surface salary figures. The absence of data is itself a data point.
Legal Exposure
No Legal Cases on Record
No defamation suits, regulatory actions, or court cases involving The Guardian personalities are currently tracked. Cases are added when public court filings reveal discrepancies between on-air statements and sworn testimony.
On Air vs. Under Oath
No Contradictions Documented
No instances have been documented where The Guardian personalities made public statements contradicted by sworn testimony or court filings. This section populates when legal proceedings expose discrepancies between on-air claims and private communications.
Coverage Patterns
No Coverage Data Yet
GDELT media analysis hasn't been run for topics involving The Guardian (theguardian.com). When topic coverage is analyzed, this section will show article counts, outlet reach, and tone patterns for each tracked topic.
Detected Trends
No Trends Detected
No narrative alignment, coverage gaps, talking point coordination, or source concentration patterns involving The Guardian have been detected yet. Trends surface automatically when cross-outlet analysis identifies statistically significant patterns.
Tracked Personalities at The Guardian
Media figures at this outlet whose statements are being monitored.